The Cruz Azul board's decision to reject alpine Daniel Quintero Huitrón for the following Sunday's battle was highly criticized by the Pumas manager, ensuring that the angels are the most profitably benefited by the refereeing.

At the conclusion of the first leg of the great final, Juarez was unbeaten as they won the match with a goalless draw at the Ciudad de los Deportes stadium and there was a contentious exchange where a penalty against Cruz Azul was never scored due to Carlos Rodriguez's offside of course.

I talked about the referees at the convention yesterday, but I don't want to get too deeply into the area. What surprises me is that a large organization like Cruz Azul, one of the most significant and largest in this nation, usually wants to take advantage of situations when in this Liguilla those who have benefited the most have been them.

" They did score me against América and they did not and they still have the courage to talk," said Fernández," we must not forget the charges against Chivas, we must not forget the charges against Atlas, we must not forget the charges against Atlas, we must not forget the penalty against Chivas, we must not forget the handball against them. "

Because it is daring to go complain when they are present because of those things, because Chivas may be fighting in a different situation if not. The organization's standing in the eyes of this organization seems amazing, and it certainly does so with the intention of making the referee uncomfortable. I believe that the umpire did a fantastic job now, and it will be just that on Sunday.

The plays that Efraen Juárez left out of the audience

The Pumas trainer, Efraen Juarez, forgot to mention that the VAR was not even used to evaluate the play during the first game when Rubén Duarte missed José Paradela's tackle on the left.

In the following contentious play, where the whistler makes a serious error in how to interpret an action that comes from a foe and that, naturally, the offside should have been invalidated and given way to the penalty kick. In the penalty action that Carlos Rodriguez was invalidated, the whistler makes a serious error in how to interpret it.

Otherwise, the whistler visited the dresser to watch the VAR action and not properly analyze the play, which was a clear failure by the refereeing department.

This news has been tken from authentic news syndicates and agencies and only the wordings has been changed keeping the menaing intact. We have not done personal research yet and do not guarantee the complete genuinity and request you to verify from other sources too.